Government Policy

** All information on this page may be subject to change as the new Government reviews the department and services**

The Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) is responsible for Gypsy and Traveller issues.

Eric Pickles MP, the new Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, has announced that he intends to abolish regional bodies and their RSSs will no longer play a part in the process12. In short that means that local authorities will be required to identify sufficient sites to address the need that they have identified in the GTAAs and not the numbers of sites that the regional bodies have stipulated that they should identify. Those representing Gypsies and Travellers fear that this approach will not address the shortfall and that many local authorities will, true to historical form, bow to pressure for local people and nimbyism and do little or nothing to address the existing need and all the good work done up and down the country to reduce the shortage of sites will be wasted. Such a result would have a catastrophic effect on Gypsies and Travellers and their ability to access the healthcare and education that the rest of our society enjoys. Read more about the announcement from the coalition government here: http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/1700758

.

Friends, Families and Travellers response:

We welcome the government’s intention to introduce security of tenure on local authority Gypsy sites, as they have been obliged to do this since the 2004 ruling in the European Court of Human Rights; so this has been awaited for a long time.

However we find the other proposals worrying.

Why did this government scrap the sites grants that were available under the Homes and Communities Agency only to replace them with New Homes Bonus Scheme?  We are unclear as to how this Bonus Scheme will work as the details have not been provided yet.

It is a myth that Travellers are bypassing planning regulations that others have to abide by.  Retrospective planning applications are common from all sections of society for various things; it would be discriminatory to legislate against one small ethnic group making retrospective planning applications, when the majority of retrospective planning applications from the wider society were allowed to continue.

There is no need to withdraw Circular 01/06 and replace it with “light touch” guidance. “Light touch” sounds exactly that; what action is this government going to take to actually resolve Travellers’ severe accommodation needs, rather than keep bashing them for having them, and removing all the legislation that is there with the intention of actually resolving the problem? There are no measures the government is introducing to actually resolve the problem and provide the estimated 5,000 pitches that are needed in England alone.

Lord Avebury responses in The Guardian letter page:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/sep/06/traveller-site-targets-eric-pickles

Eric Pickles, secretary of state for communities and local government, is wrong to give the impression that giving Travellers on local authority sites security of tenure is an innovation by this government (Pickles unveils crackdown on unapproved Traveller sites, 30 August). It follows from section 318 of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, which stems in turn from a 2004 ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, that treating Gypsies and Travellers less favourably than other tenants of mobile homes was a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. Implementing this ruling is very welcome, but it applies to less than half the Travellers in England. Nearly one in five are on unauthorised sites, which are to be the target of stronger enforcement powers.

This is not “putting fairness back into communities” as Mr Pickles claims. The right way is to ensure that local authorities grant planning permission for enough sites to accommodate Travellers, for the simple reason they have nowhere else to go. Letting 368 councils decide individually how many pitches they will allow is a recipe for inaction, and promising undefined financial incentives to councils to develop sites themselves cannot have greater effect than the 100% new sites grant which Mr Pickles has abolished.

Given the reluctance of councils to allocate land for Travellers, Mr Pickles is foolish to scrap the existing site targets and the prospect of government intervention where councils fail to act. That was the right way to ensure that sites would be provided, and thus unauthorised encampments eliminated.

Eric Avebury

Lib Dem, House of Lords

Guidance on Managing Unauthorised Encampments:

In 2004 the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (Now DCLG) and the Home Office jointly launched the  ”Guidance on Managing Unauthorised Encampments”. It provides guidance to local authorities, the police and others on managing unauthorised encampments.

Click here to read the document on the DCLG website.

FFT was involved in the consultation process, by the DCLG, for the creation of the “Guidance” document.

Click here to read FFT’s response to ODPM/Home Office Framework Guidance on Managing Unauthorised Camping Draft Consultation. (2003)

The Social Landlords Order 2006 (Permissible Additional Purposes:  England) relating to the provision of Gypsy and Traveller sites

Secondary legislation to allow Registered Social Landlords to build and manage Gypsy and Travellers sites and receive social housing grant for that purpose. Regulatory Impact Assessment, Race Equality Impact Assessment. Published October 2006.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1503766

Gypsy Caravan Count:

The DCLG is responsible for Gypsy and Traveller issues. The DCLG co-ordinates the bi-annual Gypsy Count and has produced

The Provision and Conditions of Local Authority Sites in England“.

Click here to read more about the Gypsy Caravan Count.

Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) Links: