Maria
Danielova lived to see the worst of the twentieth century. During the
Second World War, along with 6,500 other Roma Gypsies from what is now
the Czech Republic, Maria was deported to a Nazi concentration camp,
in her case Auschwitz. Like nine out of 10 Czech Roma, her mother, father
and sister died in the gas chambers. Maria was one of only 600 to survive.
Communism kept a tight social lid on anti-Roma racism after the war
but now the evils that Maria experienced have caught up with the next
generation. Her son, Milan, was beaten up by police during an anti-racist
demonstration. Her grandson, also called Milan, was attacked by 'skinheads'
with baseball bats. They shattered his knee, broke his hand and fractured
his skull. Her nephew was assaulted.
'My grandmother saw too many children die in the camps,' says Milan
Jnr, now in north London with his family waiting to hear whether their
application for asylum is accepted by Britain. 'Now she saw all of us
being beaten up too. For my grandmother history was repeating itself.'
Maria died in 1995. Two years later her family fled the Czech Republic
to escape the rising tide of anti-Roma violence which they, and many
others, assert is allowed to continue by state authorities - local police,
town councils, mayors - who are as racist as the thugs. 'Under Communism
it was safe, because you could go to the police,' says Milan. 'Now most
of the skinheads are policeman. Gypsies don't have any rights.'
The story of Maria and her family illustrates the depth of suffering
of a people who have fought for generations for recognition of their
plight. The violence they have experienced is horribly commonplace,
yet that Maria had children at all is unusual. 'Of the few Czech Roma
who survived the Holocaust a large proportion had either been surgically
sterilised while in the camps or rendered infertile by their treatment,'
says Dr Donald Kennrick, one of the few academics to have carried out
research on the Nazi genocide of gypsies.
Since the death of the Eastern bloc in the Nineties there have been
countless incidents of Roma being murdered or assaulted, of their homes
being firebombed and their businesses being destroyed. If the victims
were the families of Jewish survivors of the Holocaust it is unimaginable
their persecution would not be met by international condemnation. But,
because they are Roma and have been less than successful in publicising
their own cause, it has slipped by widely unremarked.
The
problems faced by the Roma of central and eastern Europe do not appear
to trouble Britain. Since the autumn of 1997, when there was a sudden
increase in the number of Roma from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and
Romania claiming asylum in Britain, the Home Office has maintained a
policy of refusing almost 100 per cent of claims at point of application.
By contrast, Canada has accepted more than 85 per cent of similar claims.
'It's clear from examination of the claims that the overwhelming majority
are purely economic migrants,' the Home Office said last week; it's
a position that has done little to discourage racist press comment with
which some tabloids and local newspapers have greeted the Roma's arrival
in the UK.
The Home Office may not be able to sustain opposition to Roma asylum-seekers
for long. On Thursday the House of Lords will give its judgment in the
case of Milan Horvath, a Slovak Roma who entered the UK with his wife
and child in October 1997.
He claimed asylum on the grounds that he had a well-founded fear of
persecution. In 1985 his father was murdered by racist thugs, a killing
police failed to investigate. His brother was beaten up by a group using
chains and baseball bats, and other Roma neighbours were killed. His
home was set on fire and ransacked so many times that he and his family
took refuge in a makeshift dugout in the back garden. The police, says
Horvath, did nothing.
Home Secretary Jack Straw has argued that the authorities in countries
like the Czech Republic and Slovakia have the powers to investigate
racist attack and that therefore Roma cannot claim a well-founded fear
of persecution as understood by the 1951 International Convention on
Refugees, because the racism is not state-sponsored.
Horvath's legal team is arguing that, whatever the theoretical position,
in practice the authorities in Slovakia are so racist that they will
not act, leaving their client in fear of his life. The House of Lords
is being asked to decide what level of police inaction amounts to the
state condoning racist violence. Should it find in Horvath's favour,
the ruling will apply to other countries.
In the early stages of Horvath's case the Home Secretary refused to
accept his account of his family's suffering. Straw said it was unbelievable
his family had been attacked so often. Since then, as the case graduated
from the asylum tribunals to the court system, his account has been
taken as fact. Even so, says Peter Jorrow of the Refugee Legal Council,
which has represented Horvath, the Home Office has little time for the
details.
'They've been ignoring the evidence,' Jorrow says. 'We put in lots of
evidence on the plight of the Roma, from the US State Department and
the UNHCR [the United Nations' refugee agency]. All they put in was
a letter from the Slovak ambassador. The Home Office refuses to engage
with the issue on an evidential basis. All they say is, in our view
it doesn't amount to persecution.'
Milan Daniel will be interested in the outcome of Horvath's case. 'The
British government say the Czech Republic is a safe country and this
is why we must go back,' he says. 'They are very, very wrong. I have
to thank the British government for all they have given us, but they
mustn't send us back. We have nothing to go back to.'
The Bock family, now living in a council flat in Clacton-on-Sea, Essex,
will be watching the Horvath case closely. Villem Bock' s father, Frantisek,
spent years as a child in Auschwitz. He was one of only three children
of 11 to survive. 'All the time my father would talk about the camp,'
Villem, 48, says. 'He told me how he saw his parents being taken to
the gas chambers. That was the last he saw of them.'
Sixty years later, Villem also found himself detained in a camp, this
time British. When he, his wife Valeria and their 10-year-old daughter
Marie arrived at Stansted Airport on 1 March, Villem was interviewed
for three days before being detained at Tinsley House, near Gatwick.
Back in the Czech Republic, Valeria's brother, Daniel, had been murdered
by racists. Valeria and Villem had, in turn, been forced out of their
jobs and then from their homes. 'They were beating people up in the
streets,' Valeria says. 'They burned down Roma houses. They did everything
they could to make life harder. We moved to a new town and the people
told us we had to leave.' So they did. 'I couldn't help but be worried
for my children.'
Their journey took them to Canada, which they left when Villem's mother,
still in the Czech Republic, was diagnosed with cancer. They left two
teenage daughters behind, who now have refugee status in Canada. As
soon as they arrived back in the Czech Republic they realised conditions
were no better. They got out, first to Norway and then to the Netherlands,
each country refusing their application. Villem was released from Tinsley
House, on payment of a surety by a supporter of the Roma cause. All
the family care about now is that they are not returned to the Czech
Republic. 'The Roma are still being attacked,' Villem says. 'It feels
as if it will soon be the same as when Hitler was in power. The skinhead
movement is too strong.
'Everybody has forgotten about the Roma. The concentration camps were
for the Jews and the Gypsies but nobody remembers the Gypsies.' There
are no museums to the Gypsy dead of the Holocaust, he says. At Lety,
in the Czech Republic, a concentration camp for Gypsies was established
during the Second World War. There are no memorials there of the sort
established at Auschwitz or Dachau. The land is now a pig farm. 'They
did it because they think of us as pigs.'
For
the Bock family and the Daniel family the Holocaust is not part of a
history that must be remembered for the sake of remembrance. It is part
of their present, the brutality of their family's past echoing down
the years.
The judges in the Lords might like to listen to those echoes as they
reach their judgment this week.